March
2003 Issue
| | Home | March 2003 Issue | |
Editorial
Colossal Failure
Nadimarg was waiting to happen. There were ample signals, which the government refused to take note of. Soon after the Jehadi outfits announced the setting up of a 'Joint Command Council' the graph of the terrorist violence went up steeply. In the week that followed, the seven major incidents took a toll of 54 people killed. This included 23 security personnel and 19 civilians. The incidents in Rajouri, particularly the burning down of 37 houses of the minority community was enough warning that the ethnic cleansing of the minority groups was high on the agenda of the terrorist entrepreneurs.
Intelligence and media reports consistently referred to the rewards being announced by ISI to enact massacres. Didn't acts of stepped-up subversion and threats of massacres warrant a thorough review of the security set-up of the pockets where, despite all odds, remnants of the Pandit community were holding on? Not only the state government refused to act on the intelligence feed back, there were serious lapses on the administrative front as well. Armed with the evidence that the terrorists were upto some mischief, Nadimarg Pandits had approached District administration for beefing up the security. The cold-blooded bureaucrats had turned them away saying if nobody had harmed them during the past 13 years why should they worry then. Disheartened by the administrative apathy, the fear stricken people subsequently sought intervention of two local CPM MLA's. Even this did not help. With such a disoriented administration, how could Nadimarg have been averted.
The exiled Pandit community has also levelled charges that PDP-led government was insincere on the return of Pandits and was just creating a media-hype on the issue, which invited the terrorist back lash. The interaction of the different delegations of Pandits with the chief minister, the unprecedented supersession in promotion of Pandit employees in state education department and J&K Bank and non-inclusion of a Pandit representative in Upper House have been sighted as proof enough of PDP's endemic hostility to the aspirations of the displaced community. If the state government was sincere about the return process, why was it pursuing the return plan in a shadowy manner and avoiding a frank dialogue with the members of the Pandit community. What did PDP and the state government do by way of building political campaigns on this issue in the Kashmir valley itself?
Return of the Pandits cannot be de-linked from the larger issue of their ethnic cleansing. Attempts to do so have only invited massacres. Cross-border terrorism and indigenous factors have contributed in equal measure to the uprootment of Pandits. With Kashmir’s social milieu decisively altered to the demands of communalism and Talibanisation, there was very little left that could assure security to the Kashmiri Pandit community. A serious return plan by the Valley's political leadership or the government would not avoid addressing these ground-level realities. The Chief Minister has commented that such massacres have taken place in the past as well. Quite true. But then, aren't these repeated massacres an indictment of the destabilsing politics pursued by the Valley's entire mainstream leadership vis-a-vis Pandits on the return issue? The Valley's political elite is reluctant to create conditions that can facilitate the return of the exiled community. Yet it has compulsions to enact a tokenist return for its own legitimacy. This dilemma is best reflected in its attempts to delink the return issue from the dialogue process and trivialising the issue of Pandit's genocide.
The State and the Central governments have also involved themselves in a blame game on passing the responsibility for massacres to the other side. Successive Central governments and the national political leadership have totally failed in drawing lessons from repeated massacres and evolving a doctrine for survival of minorities in the terrible situation of J&K. Centre's penchant to indulge in semantics on the issue of cross border terrorism v/s indigenous terrorism and delinking Muslim identity politics from terrorism, has only served to confer immunity to the local support structures of cross-border terrorism, with terrible costs for the nation.
The Centre's calculated disregard for the exiled Pandit community and other minority groups in the state has not sent positive signals to the international community. Only a State that cares for its patriotic people and can go to any extent to defend its value system is taken seriously.
The Deputy PM, Mr LK Advani recently confessed that Central government has not done justice to the exiled Pandit community. Mr Yashwant Sinha, the External Affairs Minister went on record saying, "Nadimarg has resulted in a fresh thinking in dealing with the terrorist menace". One can only hope that politicians live up to their commitments, for Nadimarg represents the colossal failure and the utter helplessness of the Indian state to protect its own citizenry.
Upanayana
or Yugnopavit
Yugnopavitam paramum pavitram
prajapateyrth
sahjam purastat
ayusham
agrim pratimoincha shuibrem
yugnopavitam
balam astu tejah
By
Pushkarnath Nehru
1.
What is Upanayana?
Upanayana
is one of the most important SAMASKARAS (symbolic
events) in the life of the child.
In
the ancient times a child was initiated into the pursuit of secular knowledge
(like astronomy, mathematics, metaphysics, logic, medicine and other vedic
literature) as well as into the realm of spiritual development by putting him on
the task of learning and practicing such disciplines by way of his parents
handing him over to a Guru for the purpose of learning and practicing them under
his guidance. But eventually this institution became out of vogue due to the
socio-economic changes. The Upanayan ceremony is now restricted to and revolves
around the investiture of the sacred thread or the ‘yugnapavit’ and the
teaching of Gayatri Mantra to the child.
By
virtue of the performance of the Upanayana ceremony, which connotes the taking
of the charge of the student by the teacher, the student is supposed to have
second birth (Dvija) in the world of knowledge through education. This is done
after staging symbolically all the previous events (Samaskaras) right from his
or her birth. In the Vedic birth of the student, symbolised by wearing the
“girdle” and the sacred thread, Savitri becomes the mother and Guru the
father.
2.
What is Yugnopavit (sacred thread) ceremony?
This
initiation of a student by the teacher, entailed various functions, such as
selection of Guru, auspicious time, preparation, wearing of garments, the
girdle, the sacred thread (“Yugnopavit”), presenting of deer skin, the
staff, Savitri Mantra, sacred fire (agnihotra) and alms etc. Later on when the
conception of Upanayana underwent a change in the course of time, the mere
initiation of the child by the teacher became a sacred lore. The original idea
of initiation for education got overshadowed by the mystic significance of
Upanayana which lead to the idea of second birth (dvija) through the Gayatri
Mantra. The initiation, which marked the taking over of the charge of the
student by the Guru, revolved around the establishment of connection between the
student and Savitri (through the Gayatri Mantra) performed by the Guru and his
teaching of this mantra.
The
Upanayana in the present form is the investiture of the sacred thread (“Yugnopavit”)
on the child which involves the initiation and symbolically staging all the said
Samaskaras. The most important part of this ceremony is the wearing of the
sacred thread and the accompaniment of the recitation and teaching of the
Gayatri (Savitri) Mantra which is one prayer that is the crux of the whole vedic
wisdom.
The
wearer of this thread is supposed to be constantly reminded of his commitment to
the secular and spiritual goals which he has set upon himself on this solemn
occasion. That this life may not pass away just in unconscious striving but
become a means of the expansion of our ‘being’; That it may provide a view
of one’s self and the world without being in conflict with the action that
comes by ; That life, even at its worst, may still provide us a source of
sharing the joyousness of our existence; This is the greatest art of life, which
comes, not through wanton experimentation, but through prayer and humility alone
and through that the divine grace.
Abiding
by the secular obligations towards his Guru, his family and the society are some
of the definitive prescriptions that cannot be separated from his spiritual
goals. Firstly the sacred thread has three folds which represents the trinity of
existence symbolizing the three worlds; Earth, Space and the Heaven or Brahma
(the unfolding of the world and this life), Vishnu (the sustenance) and Mahesh
(the re-absorption). The central knot of the sacred thread and tying together of
the three strands, represents Parambrahma (the supreme expansion of
consciousness) into which all the three ‘tattvas’ (aspects of Godhead) such
as Brahma, Vishnu and Mahesh merge. This knot is known as ‘Brahmagranthi’.
The three cords remind the wearer that he has to pay the three debts he owes to
the ancient seers (rishis), the ancestors (pitras) and the Devatas and that his
consciousness has to expand into all the three worlds. The threads are doubled
at the time of marriage signifying the additional sacramental obligations
towards his consort.
3.
Gayatri Mantra (also called Savitri)
The
focal point of the whole Upanayana ceremony is the recitation of the Gayatri
Mantra and teaching its essence to the initiated. The mantra is considered to be
the most sacred and according to Manu ‘there is nothing more exalted than the
Gayatri’.
Om
tat savitur varenyam
bhargo
devasya dhimahi
dhiyo
yo nah pracodayat
This
original ‘Gayatri Mantra’, which is also known as ‘Savitri’, is a
Rigvedic hymn (RV III, 62-10) which usually is preceded by the recitation of
‘Om Bhur, Bhuvah Svah’ which upon translation connotes :
Om
bhur bhuvah svah
tat
savitur varenyam
“That
splendid magnificence of Savitre, the Cosmic Sun, permeating the three worlds,
the Earth, the Space and the Heavens is assuredly Savitri; the inspirer, life
giver, the stimulative force"
Bhargo
devasya Dhimahi
“May
we meditate on the life giving divinity, Savitri assuredly is God, and therefore
I meditate on his splendor”.
dhiyo
Yyonha prochudayat
“May
He himself illumine our intelligence. May He himself breath it into us”.
The
Gayatri Mantra derives its name from the metre in which it is written, the
Gayatri being a Vedic poetic metre of 24 syllables of which, as per tradition,
is authored by the sage Vishvamitra. The mantra consists of three sections
(PADS) having eight syllables each and have to be recited in a particular
sequence. Therefore the Gayatri Mantra is not a magic formula nor is it merely a
logical sentence. It connects in a very special way the objective and subjective
aspects of reality. It is neither a mere sound nor sheer magic. Words have not
only sound but also meaning which is not apparent to all those who simply hear
the sound. Such living words have a power that transcends the mental plane. To
acquire this energy of the word one has to grasp not only its meaning but also
its message, or its vibrations, as they are sometimes called in order. Therefore
the phonetic quality of the mantra demands that it be recited in a particular
way. Faith, understanding and physical utterance as well as physical continuity
(since the mantra is supposed to be handed down by a master) are the essential
requisites. Every word links up with the source of all words. The ultimate
character of the word (Shabada Brahma) is a fundamental concept in spirituality.
4.
Abhid (the alms)
The
alms giving (Abhid) is now a symbolic act reminiscent of ancient institution of
obtaining voluntary contributions made for the sustenance of the Guru’s Ashram
in which the initiated students used to study. Presently during the Yugnopavit
ceremony the act of alms giving is symbolically staged and is known as Abhid.
This has now taken the complexion of “Dakshina” for the presiding Guru.
5.
Relevance of Yugnopavit in the present times
The
Yugnopavit ceremony used to be one of the most exalted functions in the life of
a Brahmin, particularly in respect of the Kashmiri Brahmins. But due to major
changes in the social and economic factors its importance in the course of time
has significantly dwindled. In recent times it has lost its vitality and
sublimity. It has unfortunately now been reduced to a social “Tamasha”
without any attempt by us to restore its former sanctity. This sacrament used to
be one of the most important instruments for inculcating and imparting
discipline, values of life and the principles of right conduct.
Now,
in the aftermath of our exodus from Kashmir it is doubly important to try and
restore the intrinsic sanctity and usefulness of this samaskara so that we are
able to give a worthy gift unto the young. Whereas modern education with its
scientific spirit and vocational training is important for our children, but at
the same time cultivation of matrices of right conduct, overall personality
development with humane values of life so as to develop a vibrant ethos are the
very essential credentials that would enable us to face the challenges of the
present world. At present our children are facing a cultural cul-de-sac which
suggests a drifting and a meaningless existence.
A
sense of direction is needed more than ever before. The infusion of the spirit
behind the “Yugnopavit” ceremony which also aims to promote compassion,
love, benevolence, non-violence, fraternity, self-discipline and finer human
relationship etc. in addition to the urge to meditate on the resurgence of the
Supreme Consciousness can act as one of the most important instruments for
achieving this goal.
The
intrinsic message of the Gayatri Mantra engulfs a wide gamut of ideals such as
what the Isha Upanishad says:-
Yastu
sarvani bhutanyatmanayay vamu pashyeti
sarva
bhuteshu ch atmanam tato na vijugupsate
yasiman
sarvani bhutanyatmyvabhdi janatah
tatra
ko moha kah shokah eikatva manupashytaha
“He
who sees all creatures in himself, himself in all creatures, does not show
abhorrence to any one; knowing all beings to be ones own-self and seeing the
unity of man-kind, how can there be for him delusions, sufferings and sorrows.”
Bala
Devi of Balahama, Srinagar
Isht
Devi of Dogra Rulers
By
Virendra Bangroo
INTRODUCTION
Ancient
Hindu Shrines in Kashmir are under constant threat of oblivion either due to
neglect or destruction.
The
village Balhama named after the Goddess Bala Devi is thirteen kilometers from
Srinagar and is surrounded by the village Wuyan in the east, Khanmoh and Zewan
in the north and Pampore in the west. The shrine of Bala Devi is connected with
link roads from the National Highway IA via Sempore and Pampore town. From
Sempore the Shrine is at a distance of 4 kms and from Pampore at a distance of
two kilometers.
BALA
DEVI SHRINE
The
shrine of Bala Devi has Jagir has thirty kanals of land attached to it. Around
the shrine proper are twelve brick pillars covered with the galvanised iron
sheets. The space in between the pillars is fenced with grills. This sort of
renovation was undertaken in 1975. Earlier the shrine was open on all sides.
Around the five sacred devdar trees in the shrine are twenty stone idols of gods
and goddesses. Painted with Vermillion these are of ancient date. There is also
a Shiv Linga in the Shrine.
MYTHOLOGY
Bata
Devi is mentioned in Mahakala-Samhita, Mantra Mahodadhi, Sri Lalitopakhyan and
Haritayan Samhita or Tripura-Rahasya.
The
three eyed Bala Devi has the moon crescent above her forehead and she has in her
hands the book and beads, and the other two hands are in Abhay and Dhyan Mudra.
She is of red complexion and wears red clothes. Sometimes she is depicted
holding Ankus a and Pasa in addition to beads and the book. She is bedecked with
the necklace of gems and pearls.
The
account of Sri Bala Devi is given in the 22nd chapter of Sri Lali Topakhyan
which forms part of Brahmand Purana. According to this text Sri Bala Devi is
said to be the daughter of Sri Lalitmaha Tripura Sundari. A the age of nine
years she become ternibly angry after seeing the Bandasura and his thirty sons
who were marching ahead for a war. Bala Devi requested her mother Maha Bhatarika
Sri Lalita Tripura Sundari to allow her to fight with the Bandasura. Permission
for which was not allowed by her mother because of her tender age. On her
daughter's insistence she not only gave her the permission but also one of her
shields and number of her attributes. With this preparation she proceeded on a
chariot towards the battle field. After an intense fight she was able to kill
the thirty sons of Bandasura.
In
Haritayan Samhita or Tripura-Rahasya, (Chapter 63), Bala Devi at the age of
eight years is said to have fought directly with Bandasura. Knowing that her
mother won't give her the permission she quietly proceeded towards the battle
field on a chariot followed by Mantrani and Dandani.
Bala
Devi was able to pierce the mighty forces of Bandasura with her rain of arrows
and then confronted the Kutilaksh, riding on a mighty elephant, the commander of
the forces of Bandasura. Bala Devi showered the arrows on the elephant and
thereafter killed Kutilaksh. Bala Devi alone destroyed the army of Bandasura and
then directly confronted the Asura. Instead of attacking Bala Devi, Bandasura
showered flowery arrows on the Devi. Seeing this the charioteer of Devi was
astonished and asked the Devi the reason for the same. Bala Devi said, “In the
last incarnation Bandasura was Mahadoot of Srilakshmi and his name was Manik
Shekhar. He was an ardent devotee of Bagvati Lalita Maha Tripura Sundar. Because
of the curse on him he became Asura and he was told to earn salvation only by
being killed by me. Knowing that I am the daughter of Sri Lalita Amba he is
worshipping me.” The war was destined and both began to fight. After defeating
the opponents Bala Devi returned to her abode, Sripuri.
FOLK
LORE
According
to the local folk lore the original abode of Bala Devi is in the South India. It
is said that the saint of the temple had a dream in which she told him to visit
Kashmir where he could have her darshana. The saint along with his devotees as
per the divine blessing visited the village of Balahama which was a dense forest
at that time. The goddess gave darshana to the saint in a spring. In order to
keep the sanctity of the shrine she directed him to plant trees around the
spring. The saint planted fine saplings of Devdar trees around the spring which
in the course of time grew to full size and covered the entire spring. The
spring is no more visible today. The five Devdar trees are believed to be more
than five thousand years old and are the principle object of veneration.
Bala
Devi is the family deity of the Dogra rulers in the Valley. Dogra ruler, Pratap
Singh used to walk bare foot for about a kilometer to reach this shrine as a
matter of respect and devotion towards this shrine. Devotees used to worship by
reciting the hyms in the praise of goddess and the milk was offered.
Every
year havan was performed in the month of Magh on the day of Tikchorum. Havan was
also performed on other auspicious days especially on Haar Chorum. Late Pandit
Jai Lal of Balahama was priest of this temple till his death in 1993.
MANAGEMENT
OF THE SHRINE
Till
1947 the Shrine was maintained by the Dogra regime and later it was taken over
by the Dharmarth Trust. But it was not taken proper care of by the Trust
authorities on the pretext that there was no income from this Shrine. The local
body named Bala Devi Asthapan Committee was formed in 1973 with Pandit Niranjan
Nath as President, Pandit Omkar Nath as Secretary, Pandit Prithvinath and Pandit
Radha Krishan as members. The first task the committee undertook was to fence
the land around the shrine to prempt encroachment. Seeing the initiative taken
by the villagers the Dharmarth Trust also came into to action and sanctioned one
chowkidar for the shrine. The committee played a great role in renovating the
temple and arranging the religious functions from time to time.
Under
the present circumstances one can only hope that powers of Bala Devi will act as
a shield against the forces of evil, ignorance and darkness till the dawn of a
new era of peace and prosperity.
Five families are still living in the village, Pt. Niranjan Nath expired in January 1999.
First
Kashmiri Chief of Air Staff
Air
Chief Marshal Swaroop Kishna Kaul
By
Dr. B.N. Sharga
Air
Chief Marshal S.K. Kaul’s ancestors were originally the residents of Habba
Kadal area of the Srinagar district of the Kashmir valley. His ancestor Pandit
Maharaj Kaul "Dattatreye" came out from the Kashmir valley in the
beginning of the 19th century during the rule of Mughal Emperor Shah alam-II
(1759-1806) around 1804 via Mughal route and finally settled down in Bazaar Sita
Ram of Delhi. After witnessing the growing influence of the British over the
administration at Delhi and lack of proper opportunities to secure a good job
his son Pandit Ram Chandra Kaul then migrated to the nearby Gwalior state to try
his luck there. After sometime he got the job in the Gwalior State Service. The
name of his son was Pandit Sri Krishna Kaul.
Pandit
Sri Krishna Kaul had his traditional education in Urdu and Persian language
under the supervision of able and learned Maulvis in the Gwalior state. After
completing his education he got a job in the Gwalior State Service but later on
he came to Lucknow in search of a job around 1842 where his cousin (Mausera Bhai)
the famous Urdu poet Pandit Day a Shanker Kaul "Naseem" was employed
in the court of Nawab Amjad Ali Shah (1842-1847) as a Bakshi. He started living
in Kashmiri Mohalla with "Naseem".
After
some time Pandit Sri Krishna Kaul got a job in the court of Nawab Wajid Ali Shah
(1847-1856) and was made a "daroga" of some department. He was
popularly known as "Bhaiyyaji" among the community members in Kashmiri
Mohalla. After the Mutiny of 1857 he joined the police department under the
British rule and was made a Sub-Inspector at Lakhimpur Kheri. He again came back
to Kashmiri Mohalla around 1875 after his retirement from the active government
service. In recognition to his loyalty towards the British Crown, he was made an
honorary Magistrate and then a Municipal Commissioner by the British and the
title of Rai Bahadur was conferred upon him. He was also an Urdu poet of repute
and used to compose his Urdu couplets under the pen name of "Takhallus",
"Yes" like his father Pandit Ram Chandra Kaul who was also an Urdu
poet. Pandit Sri Krishna Kaul used to take the guidance in Urdu poetry writing
from his cousin "Naseem" who was an established Urdu poet at that time
with a very sharp intellect. Some of the Urdu couplets composed by Pandit Sri
Krishna Kaul are there in Bahar-e-Gulshane Kashmir, Vol-II which was published
in 1932.
The
idea about the style of Pandit Sri Krishna Kaul’s poetry writing and his
selection of words to express his feelings can be formed from the following Urdu
couplets composed by him.
“Tassavur
jalwai yar dil mein hai,
allah
ki kudrat ka
Ki
butkhane mein aya hoon mein, mushtaq uski surat ka,
Na
dar roz jaza ka hai, no andesha kayamat ka
Tarsa
hoon uski baksheesh ko, bharosa hai inayat ka,
Ajeeb
rind behkhoob tak mein hai, dukhtare raz ki,
Dilhi
khair ho ab to hafiz uski, hurmat ka,
Fidaye
naz ho kar, mar gaya zere kadam uski,
Ki
naksho payenaz kab nishan hain meri turbat ka,
Damgar
yeh nikalte hain jo ashk garam aakhon se,
Asar
baki abhi hai sozish dil ki hararat ka."
His
son Pt. Shyam Krishna Kaul after completing his education went to Calcutta (Kolkata)
and got a job in the Calcutta-Nagpur railway section of that time. He
subsequently became an audit officer in the same railway division. Pt. Shyam
Krishna Kaul’s son Pt. Kunwar Krishna Kaul after the death of his father got
the job in the same railway division with its headquarters at Calcutta. Pt.
Kunwar Krishna Kaul was married with Roop Kumari who was the daughter of Pt.
Triloki Nath Kaul, a leading criminal lawyer of Bahraich and grand daughter of
Pt. Baij Nath Kaul "Chungi" of Kashmiri Mohalla, Lucknow. He had three
sons Pratap Krishna, Hari Krishna and Swaroop Krishna.
Pandit
Kunwar Krishna Kaul’s brother Pandit Brij Krishna Kaul "Bekhabar"
was also a reputed Urdu poet of Kashmiri Mohalla, Lucknow. Pandit Brij Krishna
Kaul did a monumental work of compiling the poetic compositions of the Kashmiri
Pandit poets in the form of two volumes of "Bahar-e-Gulshane Kashmir",
He later on migrated from Lucknow to Jaipur where he died in 1927.
Pt.
Kunwar Krishna Kaul’s eldest son Pratap Krishna Kaul was born in 1930. P.K.
Kaul after completing his education became an I.A.S. Officer. He was posted in
Lucknow as a city Magistrate around 1954. After working in various posts in the
various districts of U.P. and in the secretariat at Lucknow, he ultimately
become a Cabinet Secretary in the Central government around 1984. He then became
India’s ambassador to the United States of America in 1986. He retired from
active government service in 1990. He is married with Usha who is the daughter
of Pt. Krishna Narain Channa and grand daughter of Pt. Laxmi Narain Channa of
Jammu.
Pt.
Kunwar Krishna Kaul's second son Hari Krishna Kaul was born in 1932. He got
married with Subhadra who is the daughter of Pt. Jai Narain Urga. He died quite
young in July 1982 at the age of about 50 years.
Pt.
Kunwar Krishna Kaul's third and the last son A.C.M. Swaroop Krishna Kaul was
born on 20th December 1934 in Kashmiri Mohalla, Lucknow. He had his early
schooling in Beasant College in Benaras (Varanasi) which is run by the Rishi
Valley Trust of the Theosophical Society of India founded by Annie Beasant. He
did his matriculation from this institution in 1949. He then joined the
Government College, Allahabad and did his F.Sc. from there in 1951.
After
that he joined the National Defence Academy at Kharakvasla in December 1951 and
did his graduation course in military training. After passing out from N.D.A. in
December 1952 he joined the Air Force Academy at Jodhpur and then did six months
extensive training course in flying jet aircrafts at the jet Training Wing of
the Air Force at Hakimpet in Secundarabad. He then got his commission in the
Indian Air Force in December 1954 as a Pilot Officer in the Squardon No: 17 of
the Air Force at Adampur.
It
was only in 1954 that the Indian Air Force had its first Indian Chief when Air
Marshal Subodh Mukherjee became the chief of the Air Staff. As the top ranking
British officers of the Air Force left for their country lock, stock and barrel,
so the junior Indian officers got quick promotions in the Air Force after the
independence of the country.
During
the Indo-Pak war of 1965 Air Chief Marshal S.K. Kaul was based at Pathankot. He
flew mystery air craft and took a very active part in these operations. He was a
part of the 28 aircraft strike formations of our Air Force which struck the
Chamb-Jourian sector on 17th September 1965 and which was mainly responsible for
successfully thwarting and blunting the Pakistani Armour thrust in our
territory. Throughout this conflict he undertook many offensive strikes and air
support missions to provide air cover to our marching troops in the Pasrur Bulge
Sialkot sector of the war front. Our armed forces gave a crushing defeat to the
Pakistan army in this war and moved up to the outskirts of the Lahore city.
After this the government raised the rank of the Chief of the Air Staff from Air
Marshal to Air Chief Marshal.
Air
Chief Marshal S.K. Kaul after this war got the promotion and was made a
Commanding Officer of a hunter bomber squadron at Hasimasa in the eastern
sector.
India
came to the rescue of "Mukti Bahni" in 1971 to provide it logistic
support in their freedom struggle and at the same time to stop the massive
influx of refugees from across the border into our territory.
Though
actual Indo-Pak war started on 3rd December 1971 but prior to that Air Chief
Marshal S.K. Kaul who was Wing Commander at that time started under taking photo
reconnaissance missions over erstwhile East Pakistan since October 1971. These
missions were specially carried out deep into enemy territories covering heavily
defended sectors of Comilla, Sylhet and Saidpur. The photographs obtained
through these drae devil missions of the fortified enemy positions helped our
armed forces to finalise their assault plans accordingly to minimise the
casualty figures.
Throughout
1971 war Air Chief Marshal S.K. Kaul carried out strike missions with top
precision on military targets of the enemy covering practically the whole area
of the erstwhile east Pakistan. He also led some important missions such as an
attack on the Dhaka Government House. This mission was a great success and
ultimately forced the Pak army to surrender before our armed forces. For this
gallantry, determination, professional skill and leadership of a very high order
the then President of India V.V. Giri honoured him with Mahavir Chakra (M.V.C.).
His
citation reads "on 4th December 1971, he again volunteered for another task
to photograph the Tejgaon and Karmitola airfields. His reconnaissance flights
over these two airfields in the face of the most sustained and heavy enemy
ground fire, stands out as acts of heroism, extreme gallantry and devotion to
duty, in addition to his reconnaissance exploits, he led the very first eight
air crafts strike mission over Dhaka. In this raid his formation encountered
enemy aircraft near the target areas. With exemplary leadership, he maneuvered
his force in such a manner that two of the enemy aircrafts could be shot down
and the other two fled away. The target thus became clear for attack and all
through the war he led his squadron boldly and courageously in the face of the
enemy. "
After
this war A.C.M., S.K. Kaul became chief operation officer at the Pune Air Force
station which is one of the major flying base of the Indian Air Force. He was
then made the Wing Commander and group captain in the directorate of Air
Intelligence at the Air Force headquarters at New Delhi.
After
completing this important assignment A.C.M., S.K. Kaul became the Air Officer
Commanding of the Air Force station at Bareilly, which is a very important Air
Base of the Central Command. It houses two squadrons with highly specialized
role of strategic reconnaissance and electronic warfare.
When
Mrs. Indira Gandhi became the Prime Minister of the country for the second time
in 1980 after the fall of the Janta Party Government, she sent A.C.M., S.K. Kaul
to Moscow in 1982 as the Air Attache in the Indian embassy there. He held this
post upto January 1986. During this period there was an unprecedented
procurement and induction of a large number of air crafts and other weapon
systems from the erstwhile Soviet Union for the Indian Air Force to make it one
of the best in the world. These included MiG-29, AN-32, 12-76 aircrafts and
Mi-17 and Mi-26 helicopters. Apart from all this A.C.M., S.K. Kaul successfully
co-ordinated the induction of Radar and Missile systems for the IAF as well.
While at Moscow he was also instrumental for the co-ordination of first
Indo-Soviet joint space venture very successfully in which Squadron leader
Rakesh Sharma carried out his historic space journey to become the first Indian
consmonaught. During this period he also arranged, the training in U.S.S.R. of a
large number of Indian Air Force personnels for the newly acquired weapon
systems from that country.
After
his return from Moscow he was posted as the Director of Personnel (Officers) at
the Air Force Headquarters at New Delhi. He was then made the senior Air Staff
Officer at the South Western Air Command at Jodhpur. During this two years stint
at the Jodhpur Air Base apart from conducting the routine air exercises, he
reorganised the total Air Defence environment of that important region, which
included the integration of the Army Radars with the Air Force for providing
proper Air Defence to the Bombay high region from any strike by the enemy.
Around
1989 he was appointed as the senior air staff officer in CAC
at Allahabad. He again rearranged the operational air exercises, which
were conducted in this command to give it a total thrust towards the task
oriented training. Under this command a large scale air borne operations
involving a battalion group, paradropping and heliborne operations, dropping two
company groups were organised and very successfully conducted, thus enhancing
our capabilities in this field.
In
February 1991 he became AOC-in-C of the Central Air Command and he remained on
this post up to 30 April 1992. During this tenure he devoted his special
attention towards optimization and utilization of the resources and
simultaneously identifying the areas for effecting economy, both in manpower and
materials by taking effective steps to curtail the unproductive expenditure.
Apart from all this he also gave special attention towards the welfare of the
air personnel. Under his command greater efforts were made and due emphasis was
given to improve the quality of life at all the stations of the Air Force by
providing a better and healthier environment in them with improved facilities.
In
order to project and identify the Air Force with our countrymen, particularly
those living in the rural areas, a scheme was launched to adopt a village
continguous to the Air Force camps. For carrying out all this work and for his
distinguished record of service of the most extraordinary nature the then
President of India Mr. R.Venkataraman awarded him with Param Vishisht Seva Medal
in 1992.
On
18th May 1992 he was appointed as the AOC-in-Chief of the Western Air Command,
which is the largest and one of the most important operational command of the
IAF to keep a constant vigil on the western border of our country. In order to
promote closer co-operation and better integration of joint planning between the
Army and the Air Force he institutionalised bi-annual conferences with both
Northern and Western Command of the Army with active support of the two GOCs-in-C.
These conference, helped a lot in building up a better understanding between the
two wings of our armed forces, the Army and the Air Force thus paving a way for
integrated joint planning for future wars.
On
31st July 1993 he was appointed by the government as the chief of the Air Staff.
He retired from this post on 21 December 1995 after putting in 42 years of
active service in the Indian Air Force. In November 1994, he was also appointed
as Chairman of the Chiefs of Staff Committee. In this capacity he gave great
impetus to joint planning and co-operation in conducting any operation.
Air
Chief Marshal S.K. Kaul got married on 11 December 1962 at Bhopal in Madhya
Pradesh with Nita the daughter of Pt. Chand Narain Raina "Chand" of
Lahore who was a reputed Urdu poet. Mrs. Nita Kaul is a very active social
worker. She has contributed a lot in the field of adult education by regularly
organising various adult education programmes at the places where her husband
was posted from time to time. She has also worked for the institutions for the
handicapped children at most of the Air Bases. She also made the Air Force Wives
Welfare Association meaningful by involving a large number of wives of the Air
Force personnels in various ventures and social programmes. This couple has two
daughters Shivani and Devyani. The former is married with Sanjay Tikku while the
latter is married with Barmali Agrawal.
Air Chief Marshal S.K Kaul is a charming personality. He was a keen sportsman during his young age. Golf and Tennis are his most favourite games. He loves reading books on various subjects and listening Indian Classical music. He is popularity known as Supp Bhai among his relatives and close friends. He is humble and highly cultured . He has over 3700 hours of accident free flying record to his credit which is a very remarkable feat indeed. He had flown various types of fighter and bombar supersonic aircrafts held out in the inventory of the Indian Air Force from the Vampires in the 1950s to the latest MiG-23, Jagaur, MiG-29, and Mirage-2000 aircrafts. After his retirement from service he settled down in the Gurgaon.
Kashmir
By
Shamim Ahmed Shamim
The
accord that took place between Mrs. Gandhi and Sheikh Abdullah in February 1975
after two years' prolonged parleys, marks a watershed in the politics, if not
the history, of the state. The arrest of Sheikh Abdullah in 1953, his
imprisonment, subsequent externment, and declaring the Plebiscite Front an
unlawful party had not only eroded the legitimacy of the accession but cast a
shadow on the democratic institutions and the functioning of democracy in the
country. Undoubtedly the use of force, repression and other unlawful practices
had started in the Sheikh's regime itself in the 1951 State Assembly elections.
But, after 1953, what passed under the pretence of elections in the State, and
the manner in which the country's political parties and national press entered
into a conspiracy of silence, accepting the suppression of justice, democracy
and moral values as an unpalatable yet inevitable reality, left an indelible
stigma on the fabric of Indian democracy.
I
am firm in my opinion that all the experiments put to use in other parts of the
country to pervert the electoral process with the help of government machinery,
political repression and money power, were initially tried and tested in the
laboratory of Kashmir. The repeated use of these reprehensible devices so dulled
our democratic sensibility that the clamping down of internal emergency became
not only possible but also acceptable, at least during the earlier phase. The
facade of Assembly elections in 1951 and then bypassing the same Assembly in
1953, deposing and arresting Sheikh Abdullah, signalled the starting point of a
journey which twenty two years later finally culminated in overwhelming the
nation with an internal emergency.
Against
such a back-drop, the Indira-Addullah accord of February 1975, was a significant
step towards normalising the political process in the State; and Mrs. Gandhi
quite rightly deserves kudos and credit for this act of statesmanship and
farsightedness. Without conceding a single demand, she persuaded the Sheikh to
accept the Chief Ministership of the State on Congress support.
Having
remained in political wilderness for 22 years, Sheikh Abdullah, accepting the
realities of the situation, renounced the slogan of self-determination,
plebiscite and demand for restoration of the 1953 status of the state. For some
time, however, he stubbornly insisted that he should be called the Prime
Minister instead of the Chief Minister. Mrs. Gandhi granted it partially,
allowing him to call himself Prime Minister if he so wished, but making it clear
that the Centre would refer to him only as Chief Minister.
Although
it is true that India's stand on Kashmir, its constitutional position and
international commitments have in no way been affected or influenced by the
accord, the State undoubetly has undergone a qualitative change: a semi-balance
of peace, stability and normality has entered the political scene.
Notwithstanding his controversial personality, erratic politics and
short-sighted perspective, Sheikh Abdullah continues to be the most charismatic
figure dominating Kashmir politics, holding the centre of the stage for the last
50 years as a symbol of Kashmiri nationalism.
To
cap it all, his dismissal, arrest, imprisonment, externment, in fact every
insult and injustice inflicted upon him has given him a martyr's halo, making
him more and more popular. Consequently, he has emerged as the most outstanding
example of Kashmiri aspirations. The efforts of his successors and the Centre to
keep him out of politics and power proved so counter productive that to extern
or imprison him at every subsequent election in the State, became an unavoidable
necessity upto 1971. The Sheikh and the Plebiscite Front made their task easier
by boycotting those elections. But when he decided to participate in 1971, the
State government had to impose restrictions on his entry into the State and to
meet this danger the Centre had to declare the Plebiscite Front an unlawful
party.
These
undemocratic and high handed methods gave rise to a self-seeking, pelf-seeking
class which wielded unbridled authority to do whatever it liked in the name of
loyalty to the Central government and the ruling party. To deal with Sheikh
Abdullah and his incendiary politics, the Centre was compelled to support these
'loyalists'. Thus, we got into a vicious circle, with little hope of extricating
ourselves.
Whatever
the motives and considerations that weighed with Mrs. Gandhi and the Sheikh in
forging the accord, its incontrovertible end product is the possibility of
breaking this vicious circle, and being released from the anomalous and
monopolitical strangle-hold of the Congress on the politics of the State. The
March 1977 revolution has given to these possibilities a clear and concrete
shape. As a result, for the first time after Independence, the Sheikh and his
party, the National Conference, have come into power, after the conduct of what
were comparatively free and impartial elections. In fact, it is such an
extraordinary and revolutionary change that it would have been impossible even
to think of it a year earlier. This pleasant but unexpected turn to the
situation must have been a surprise for even Sheikh Abdullah and his colleagues.
In
January 1977, before the declaration of general elections, the Sheikh held talks
with Mrs Gandhi on the distribution of Assembly seats between the Congress and
the National Conference on a basis of equality. The distribution of
parliamentary seats had in fact been done on this very principle of fifty-fifty.
Had Mrs. Gandhi won the elections, it was likely that he would have found it
difficult to secure even 50% seats. But, whereas the March 1977 elections
liberated the country from dynastic rule and bondage of fear, it also set free
the Sheikh and his party from the shackles of political compromise and
agreements.
The
manner in which the Sheikh lent his unreserved and unqualified support to Mrs.
Gandhi and the Emergency after having become the Chief Minister, pointedly
highlights the fact that he had not accepted the realities of a changed
situation resulting from a change in ideology or mental attitudes, but as the
single entry-point to the place of power. For this very reason, the political
accord proved the starting point of many of his compromises on principles and
points of view and, right up to Mrs. Gandhi's debacle in March 1977, he
continued making compromises with his avowed stands at every step. Such a
climbdown, though hardly in harmony with his political stature and popular
image, was an inevitable consequence of the Sheikh's political style and the
background against which the accord was forged.
For
Mrs. Gandhi, the accord had all the advantages. Without conceding anything she
achieved all that her father failed to achieve in his life time. The process
that had been set into motion with the withdrawal of the conspiracy case against
the Sheikh in 1964 had been left half way through because of Nehru's death.
Eleven years later his daughter led it to its logical conclusion. Jawaharlal was
unhappy with Sheikh Abdullah's separatist political and pro-Pak stance. He
wanted the Sheikh to accept the accession as final. The Indira-Abdullah accord
represents the fulfillment of this wish. But, for Sheikh Abdullah, the agreement
was no more than a charter of unfulfilled hopes and shattered dreams.
It
was the outcome of his frustration and disillusionment. In spite of 22 years of
imprisonment, exile and isolation from the position of power, he had seen no
light emerging from anywhere. Meanwhile, a new generation had come to the fore.
And this generation was free from the kind of emotional attachment which bound
the elders to him. On the other hand, they held him responsible for those
involved political entanglements, the complexities of which had shadowed their
birth and growth. On the one hand, notwithstanding his stature and popularity,
the fact of his being out of power coupled with the demands of practical
politics had gradually rendered him irrelevant; on the other, the power blocks
had lost interest in the Kashmir issue and the Security Council resolutions on
Indo-Pak relations attracted the idle curiosity of research scholars only.
Pakistan too had ceased to sustain life in a receding hope which petered out
finally in 1965.
Dejected
by Pakistan, the Sheikh eventually gave up the politics of non-cooperation and
decided to participate in the elections in 1971. It is a pity that the State and
Central governments prevented him from doing so, imposing restrictions on his
re-entry into the State. This frustrated him further. The defeat of Pakistan in
the Bangladesh war of 1971, shook him to the roots, delivering a crippling blow
to his determination and resistance. Not only had Sheikh Abdullah refused to
condemn the barbaric policies that Pakistan pursued during the early days of
military intervention in Bangladesh, but in an interview published in a
Hyderabad Urdu daily, he had justified the actions of General Yahya Khan and the
notorious Tikka Khan.
The
breakdown of the Pakistan war machine and the creation of Bangladesh now fully
and finally convinced him that Pakistan could no longer keep the Kashmir issue
alive. Thus, he turned to rebuild his broken bridges with Mrs. Gandhi. It must
be said to the credit of Mrs. Gandhi that she seized the opportunity and
encouraged the move. Had the present Prime Minister, Morarji Desai, been in her
place, he would possibly have lost the opportunity by his stubborn attitude and
rigid behaviour. In fact, after the creation of Bangladesh, when Sheikh Abdullah
chose the path of reconciliation, giving up the posture of confrontation, Mrs.
Gandhi got him installed as Chief Minister with the help of the Congress
majority in the Legislature.
In
spite of being a significant step towards normalising the political life of the
state, fundamentally the accord was an agreement between two individuals and
nothing more. It had no legal or constitutional validity. Between February 1975
and March 1977, it came to breaking point on many an occasion and the credit
goes to the Sheikh that he saved it from getting snapped, albeit at the cost of
his self-respect and personal pride. Precisely for this reason, the Congress
Party withdrew its support to Sheikh Abdullah from the legislature and
practically finished the accord after its defeat in March 1967. What followed
has put a stop to the artifices and artificiaries of the politics of agreements,
providing an opportunity to build the state politics on more firm, lasting and
purposeful foundations.
The
recent changes in the politics of the State must be welcomed from this point of
view. The present government and its leadership has come into existence through
free elections and public confidence, instead of political agreements and
personal expediency. Thus, for the first time during the last 30 years, the
democratic process has been allowed a free flow along its natural course.
There
is no denying that to win the Assembly elections Sheikh Abdullah had fanned
feelings of communalism, internal autonomy, parochialism and regionalism. He had
created such an atmosphere that quite a few political observers, while conceding
the elections to have been free, refuse to accept them as fair. But, to use a
biblical image, would there be any politician in the land who could pelt the
first stone at him?
It
is worthy to note that to ensure his success at the polls the Sheikh, instead of
banking upon his sacrifice, popularity and charisma had to take recourse to such
trite and tried manoeuvres which are used by ordinary professional politicians.
Some say that to influence the voters and evoke their sympathy, he even
prolonged his illness. Whether this is true or false no one can tell. But there
is no doubt that Sheikh Abdullah staked everything to win the last elections.
It
goes to the credit of the Janata Government that it allowed the freest elections
to the State, for the first time since independence, thus proving to the people
of Kashmir that they too have the same fundamental democratic rights which the
people in the rest of the country enjoy and exercise. In particularly, for the
Muslims of the Valley, it was an incredible phenomenon that only two candidates
of the ruling party at the Centre-the Janata Party--were returned out of the 42
seats it contested. In the past, some eighty to ninety percent candidates
belonging to the ruling party used to win with 'large majorities'. From this
point of view alone, the July 77 elections represent an important experiment in
the politics of the State which are bound to yield good results.
While
the results of the ’77 Assembly elections have demonstrated in full measure,
Sheikh Abdullah's impressive strength they have also set limits and exposed the
shortcomings of his success and influence. For instance, it is significant that
the National Conference, in spite of its secular and noncommunal cast, has
emerged only as a representative party of the Muslims in the State. That
explains its slender image in Jammu where it received only seven out of a total
of 32 seats and its all pervasive position in the Valley where it bagged all but
three of the 42 seats.
It
was the direct result of communal preaching and regional stance projected by the
party during electioneering. In fact, if the Janata rebels had not contested the
officially fielded candidates and thus divided the vote, the National Conference
would hardly have managed a seat or two in Jammu.
Another
significant factor to note is that in spite of the charismatic personality of
Sheikh Abdullah and the calmly thought out slogans, calculated to heartwarm
sectarian feelings, the National Conference was able to muster only 46% of the
total votes polled, even though it secured 49 seats. In other words, the Sheikh
won the election but lost the plebiscite. Let alone the fact that the Janata
Party and its allies got a severe bashing at the hustings, it has brought
stability to State politics and promoted the national cause in an extraordinary
measure.
The
recent political changes and developments in Jammu and Kashmir affirm that there
are no shortcuts to political stability and national stability and national
intergrity other than the democratic ones. The traumatic experience that the
country passed through during the Emergency, and the current political situation
in Pakistan, emphasised its importance even more clearly. Likewise, it is
certain that the democratic system cannot be sustained, much less strengthened
in the rest of the country if it is suppressed in a part of it, be it Nagaland
or Kashmir.
Now
that a normal political process has been set into motion in Kashmir, it should
not be prevented from taking its logical and natural course by raising the
sceptre of the threat to national solidarity, the country's interest and
territorial integrity as in the past.
In
view of his earlier secessionist postures, some quarters are some what
apprehensive about Sheikh Abdullah's recent statements and utterances regarding
the internal autonomy of the State. In my opinion, however, there is no need to
read any far-reaching ambition in these public postures and statements. The
fundamental fact is that he accepts Kashmir as an integral part of India, and
regards Kashmir's accession as irrevocable and final.
It
is well known that in spite of getting tremendous moral and material support
from Pakistan during the last 22 years, the Sheikh has at no stage been in
favour of Kashmir's accession to Pakistan. Having now acquired power through
free elections, he could have little use for Pakistan. On the contrary, he has
been talking of the return of State. His demand for his inclusion in any talks
that India holds with Pakistan regarding Kashmir, betrays a psychological
aberration rather than any political ambition. This is the nostalgia of the
fifties, when big power interests in Kashmir and debates in the United Nations
and other international forums kept him in the limelight, making him an
international figure.
The
most interesting aspect of Kashmir's current politics is the absence of any
ideological base and economic programme in the State's most organised and
influential organisation, the National Conference. True that it had a
socio-economic programme called 'New Kashmir' before independence. But in the
present day context, the document is an historical anachronism. In the
euphoria of the newly acquired power in 1975, no attempt at redefining political
aims and economic goals was made, while the Plebiscite Front was rechristened
the 'National Conference'. On the contrary, Sheikh Abdullah repeatedly
emphasised that we should give a 'holiday' to politics for some time and get
down to work.
After
the imposition of Emergency, he was even more emphatic about this. But when all
the equations of power and politics underwent a sea change, consequent upon the
March 77 election, the National Conference leadership became keenly aware of the
absence of political ideology and economic programme. To tackle this problem,
Sheikh Abdullah tried to smoothen the way for an understanding with the new
Central government and Janata leaders, so that under a new arrangement he
continued to hold the reins of power. Fortunately for the State, the Janata
leadership refused to have any such understanding and Kashmir was saved from yet
one more spell of the 'politics of agreements'.
It
was only when he had failed to strike this bargain that the Sheikh, raising the
issue of internal autonomy and of safeguarding Article 370 during the Assembly
elections, created an artificial atmosphere of confrontation between the Centre
and the State, although the Foreign Minister, A.B. Vajpayee, while participating
in the debate on Karan Singh's motion of adjournment against the imposition of
Governor's rule in the State, had clearly stated that no change would be made in
Article 370, without consulting the people of the state. Despite the fact that
he too knew fully well that the Janata government had no such intentions, the
Sheikh, in search of an election issue, 'invented' the spectre of danger to
internal autonomy and Article 370, generating tremendous sympathy for him and
support for his party.
The
true nature of Sheikh Abdullah's interest and concern for the State's internal
autonomy and safeguarding of Article 370 is, however, betrayed by his and his
party's unconditional acceptance of the 42nd
amendment
during the Emergency. A committee appointed under the chairmanship of Afzal Beg,
the Vice-President of the National Conference, described the amendment as
'consistent with the needs and demands of the time,' although it considerably
eroded the country's federal structure and the State's internal autonomy. In
terms of the amendment, if Parliament chose to abrogate Article 370 of the
Constitution, the State government and Sheikh Abdullah could not have knocked at
the Supreme Court gates, and Sheikh Abdullah and his party, instead of
protesting against it, welcomed it.
The
recent Sheikh-Jyoti Basu talks and statements regarding more and more autonomy
to the States should be assessed against this background. With the Sheikh,
autonomy is his total politics; with Basu an important weapon to carry forward
his social aims, in conformity with his political ideology. It is only to emerge
as the 'defender of the faith' and make up for the absence of a
politico-economic programme, that the Sheikh wants to create a sense of
insecurity among the people of the State. Personally I am in favour of granting
a greater measure of internal autonomy to the States, particularly in the
economic field; but the manner in which Sheikh Abdullah and his successors have
used it throughout to suppress the democratic rights and civic freedoms of the
people, leaves much room for doubt about its concept and content.
It
would not be out of place to mention the Public Safety Ordinance promulgated by
the Sheikh and his government in this connection. Sheikh Abdullah's demand for
internal autonomy is qualitatively different to the demand of greater powers, by
the other states. The Sheikh's demand has overtones of secessionism and
communalism, because he links the issue of autonomy with accession. The State
comprises three units, Jammu, Kashmir and Ladakh. The demand for internal
autonomy represents, at best, the aspirations of the Kashmiri Muslims. On the
contrary, the people of Jammu and Ladakh consider it as part of a plan of
Kashmiri domination. Considered in this context, Sheikh Abdullah's leadership of
this rightful demand of the other States is likely to prove a liability rather
than an asset.
The
Sheikh's advantage is that he has no political or intellectual commitment and
that is why he can flit across freely and without invitation, from a Marxist
Jyoti Basu, a fascist Indira Gandhi , to an orthodox Imam Syed Abdullah Bukhari.
The greatest contribution of Sheikh Abdullah to the politics of the State is
that he played a prominent role in secularising it. But it is an irony of
history and a paradox of present times that he himself has been in the fore in
creating communal and separatist feelings among the Muslims. The reason is that
he has throughout made use of the religious idiom to preach secularism; so that
whenever he has had to seek support of religious sentiment for personal
advancement and aggrandizement, he had conveniently made religion a tool of
politics, and politics a tool of religion.
At
any rate, that is his political style and there is no escape from it. The
tragedy is that Kashmir politics have stagnated under this style and stunted the
growth of the Kashmiri people. Consequently, in this last quarter of the 20th
Century,
Kashmiris find themselves in the darkness of tribal ways of thought and
reaction, prejudices and fears. The geographical conspiracy of nature of shut
Kashmir up in a trap has been further strengthened by politicians by
strengthening these barricades rather than breaking them down.
In
this analysis, I have dwelt in detail on Sheikh Abdullah's personality and
political attitudes. It was unavoidable. For, the Sheikh has been the
fountain-head, centre and pivot of Kashmir politics for the last 50 years. Any
objective analysis of Kashmir politics is bound to prove incomplete without an
analysis of this subjective aspect of his personality. This undoubtedly sets the
seal on Sheikh Abdullah as an extremely popular leader, wielding tremendous
political influence; but it also points toward the mental and political
backwardness of Kashmir, where persons matter more and issues and ideologies
less. The fact is that politics in Kashmir has yet to be released from the
strangle-hold of religiosity and ritual.
Consequently,
the population, in terms of alignment and allegiance, is divided between
different religious leaders, the Sheikh and Mirwaiz Farooq being the main
contenders. The former uses the famous shrine of Hazratbal as his political
platform and the latter the historical Jama Masjid of Srinagar as his political
fortress. Taking their cue from them and encouraged by their successful
manoeuvres both Shia and the Jamait-Islami leaders have joined the political
game. Jamait-Islami, ironically, was encouraged by the ruling Congress Party in
its efforts to enter the political arena with a view to steal Sheikh Abdullah's
thunder. That explains why the party secured 5 seats in the State Assembly in
the 1972 elections.
But
is it is almost impossible to beat the Sheikh at his own game. The political
influence of the Jamait vanished overnight when it clashed with him in the
panchayat elections of 1974 and in the recent Assembly elections. The party has
managed to get only one seat in the State Assembly. The Shia leaders are also
busy organising their followers for political purposes and thus renewing the
age-old Shia-Sunni conflict. The recent clashes between the two sects is
symptomatic of the growing politicalization and exploitation of the two
communities.
Among
the other political parties the Janata Party, the two Congresses and Mirwaiz
Farooq's Awami Action Committee deserve some mention. The Janata sapling is
unlikely to strike roots in the Valley. Its constituents, Jana Sangh, BLD,
Organisation Congress and Socialist Party, did not exist in the Valley; hence
there was no ready-made cadre available to the Janata Party when it started
functioning in the State in April 77. Sheikh Abdullah too delivered a stunning
blow to it by calling it the 'Jana Sangh in a different garb'.
Finally,
the utter defeat it suffered at the polls has completely disheartened those who
rallied under its banner. The state of the party in the Valley can be judged
from the fact that it cannot get a couple of rooms for its central office in the
city of Srinagar. In other words, the party has no postal address.
As
against this, in Jammu, it built up on the existent Jana Sangh base. Whereas the
party has not even a central office in Srinagar, in Jammu it has several
parallel offices. On account of the tug and pull between the Jana Sangh and
non-Jana Sangh elements in Jammu, the party is in utter confusion which the
Central leadership has yet to sort out. The increasing influence of the
erstwhile Jana Sangh spells grave danger for the party's future as the minority
community in the region would prefer joining the Congress or the National
Conference rather than the Janata.
In
the Valley, the existence of the Congress, right from the beginning has depended
on the prestige of the Central government, the power and the vested interest
that surround it. That explains its disintegration after its removal from the
seat of power. The split at the top has staggered it further, and sizeable
sections of Congress workers are switching over to the Janata and National
Conference. In Jammu, the Congress though in a more stable position, has
suffered considerably due to the split at the national level. The emerging
position has exposed and exploded the myth of Karan Singh's popularity and
influence in Jammu where the bulk of the Congress has gone with Indira Gandhi,
whose faction appears stronger than the Reddy Congress. This may be partly due
to the Sheikh's support and sympathy for Indira Gandhi.
Mirwaiz
Farooq is essentially a religious leader but his political ambition is not
unknown. During the Assembly elections in July 77, he threw his lot in with the
Janata by supporting it. However, only one candidate fielded by his party, the
Awami Action Committee, won. He and his party are considered to have Pak
leanings. But changes in the Indo-Pak political scene have reduced his influence
which is anyhow restricted to the few areas of Srinagar city alone. One of the
healthier aspects of the process of normalisation of State politics since July
1977, is the complete eclipse of the secessionist elements in the Valley.
Mirwaiz Farooq's support to the Janata Party (and he continues to be friendly)
was a significant factor in this direction. Whatever may have been his reasons
for supporting the Janata Party against Sheikh's National Conference, it clearly
indicates the qualitative change in the extremist politics of Kashmir and
Kashmiri leaders.
Source: SEMINAR, April, 1978
*The author, a former MP edited ‘AINA’ and was a talented journalist in Urdu. Recently an anthology of his writings in AINA, has been brought in two volumes.
We
are like thoughts, you should have thought us
By
Dileep Kumar Kaul
Who
does not know about the Scindia dynasty of Gwalior? Madhao Rao Scindia of our
times, died in an air crash. In the beginning of twentieth century Maharaja
Madhao Rao Scindia-I died in Paris. He had only one man by his side in whose lap
he breathed his last. This man was a Kashmiri Pandit. Colonel (Sir) Kailash Nath
Haksar.
There
is a Kashmiri idiom ‘Mecchi Noon Dyuni’ i.e. to salt somebody's oil so that
he is totally incapacitated. There is a technique in Agriculture called 'Bauthra
technique'. This technique which enables one to make saline and barren soils fit
for agriculture, is approved by the Indian Council of Agricultural Research. And
who invented this technique? The famous botanist Dr Kailas Nath Kaul.
These
and such many other achievements of Kashmiri Pandits are given in the four
volumes of the work 'Kashmiri Panditon Ke Anmol Ratna' written by Dr B.N. Sharga.
It is a collection of biographies of eighty Kashmiri Pandits who made exemplary
contributions to the whole nation in general and the community in particular for
about last three centuries. Dr Sharga has taken pains to research, through the
history of these families, when did they migrate from Kashmir and where does
their progeny live now.
This
work is of utmost importance in contemporary times when the coming generations
face the danger of forgetting their history and the foundations laid by their
fore fathers. It is only a part of an exiled community which thinks about the
self esteem and ethos of the community. Dr Sharga through this work has given a
message to the coming generations that these 80 Kashmiri Pandits lived a life of
activity and had a remarkable influence on Indian society but never forgot their
KP identity. Yes! we are the people in whose serene and consoling laps Kings
breathed their last and whose hands made berren lands of the country grow
flowers and crops, and a lot more. We have no reason to feel disappointed but
have to understand that there is nothing that we cannot do.
The
book makes it clear that there were two centres of Kashmiri Pandit activity
where KP migrants resided. One was Sitaram Bazar of Delhi and the other Kashmiri
Mohalla of Lucknow. Kashmiri Pandits were scattered all over India but these
were the most important places from where they made their mark. The Kashmiri
Pandits are known as the people who like white collar jobs. But in these four
volumes one is astonished to note that there was not even a single aspect of
life in which they did not excel. KPs were poets, intellectuals, social
reformers, doctors, warriors, scientists, artists and what not. One feels happy
to note that the forefathers of all these eminent personalities migrated from
the very familiar areas of Srinagar city and other parts of Kashmir from which
the contemporary community of KPs was forced to run away.
The
contribution of famous Prem Adeeb to the beginning of Indian Cinema cannot be
ignored. His forefathers migrated from Kanya Kadal area of Srinagar city. The
immortal Chandra Mohan Wattal of 'Pukar' fame began the star tradition in Indian
cinema. But it is not mentioned that the famous role of King Akbar played by
Prithvi Raj Kapoor in 'Mughal-e-Azam' was at first given to Chandramohan, who
left the world leaving the film halfway.
Do
you know who was 'Kulbhushan Nath Pandit'. Yes! everybody knows Rajkumar, his
dialogue delivery and acting. His forefathers had migrated from Karwani Mohalla
which is near Fateh Kadal in Srinagar city.
The
personalities like R.N. Kaw (the founder of RAW) and General T.N. Raina (GoC-in-C)
need no introduction. The predecessors of R.N. Kaw migrated in 18th
century from
Zaindar Mohalla of Srinagar city and those of General Raina migrated from Habba
Kadal. These personalities can be put as ideals before our children so that they
feel associated with their roots and the place of origin. Eminent Kashmiri
Pandit ladies are also put forward. These include Sheela Kaul, Dr Jagat Mohini
and all time great saints like Lal Ded and Roop Bhawani.
Beginning
the work with Lal Ded would have given a different meaning to the whole work.
But an important personality like Padmawati Fotedar alias 'Nun' has been
excluded. Padmawati Fotedar, mother of Pt. Shivnarain Fotedar, was the first KP
lady to become a teacher. She remembered the name of every girl in her classes
and would rush to their homes if they would not attend the school even for a
day. One very conspicuously feels the absence of Hakeem Sham Lal Bhat, the
legendary practitioner of Unani medicine, who could cure the ills of those who
would come disappointed from every doctor.
The
social changes in KP community, which took place from time to time have also
been underlined. The divide in KP community when Pt. Bishan Narain Dhar from
Kashmiri Mohalla, Lucknow went to England to study law has been vividly
explained. Pt. Dhar was ostracised but he fought back along with like minded KPs.
But this anecdote has been repeated in many other biographies in the book. This
could have been put at one place and a lot of effort and space saved. The
writer, almost in every biography has given so much of his personal views about
this world that one skips and comes to main biography. This could have been
avoided through proper editing which would condense this work into two volumes
and make it more affordable and meaningful, because such a book should be owned
by all, researchers or lay men to know about a community which has suffered,
struggled and excelled throughout its history. The book is in Hindi but the
laxity of language shows that the writer is not used to writing in Hindi. The
writer tries to end almost every biography with a verse by some insignificant
poets. This also could have been avoided.
Besides,
the biographies, some articles like 'Kashmiri Pandit Aur Kashmiriat', 'Atankwad
Aur Kashmiri Auratein' 'Kashmiri Pandit Aur Homeland' are given in the volumes.
These contain very contradictory statements at some points. On P.208 Vol. 2 the
writer says, "But they (KPs) could not stay at a place for much time and
thus could not establish a standing to reflect their collective power" (My
translation) He adds that due to globalisation everybody is facing exile at some
point. Kashmiri Mohalla Lucknow and Sitaram Bazar Delhi, the power centres of
KPs lost their lustre as the KPs residing there sold their houses to the members
of other communities and went away. Condemning the idea of Homeland, he says
that with this 'Runaway mentality' how can the idea of Homeland succeed. The
writer seems to ignore the fact that demanding a homeland in itself means that
we have lost our homeland and we are claiming it, so that we may have not to run
away. The writer says nothing
significant in these articles. The volumes, without these articles would not
have been less important.
In
the biography of Pt. Avtaar Krishan Wattal we find another contradiction
regarding the mindset of Kashmiri Pandits, "Due to their escapist (Palayanwadi)
nature, the Kashmiri Pandits believe in going here and there so that they find
an adequate place to enable themselves to express their talent". (My
translation). One is compelled to think that if they want to find an adequate
place to express their talent how can they be escapists?
Despite
all this, Dr BN Sharga, has brought about a work which inculcates a
consciousness of roots in the reader. This will encourage further research on
Kashmiri Pandits.
Some
ideas of Kashmiri Pandit organisations and the newspapers published by KPs is
also given. There was a 'Kashmiri Social Conference in Lucknow' and 'Kashmiri
Pandit National Association' in Lahore. Pt. Shivnarain 'Bahar' published an Urdu
weekly 'Risala Murasali Kashmir' since 1870 for many years. Pt. Brij Lal Nehru,
started the first English Daily of Rangoon in Burma. It was he who laid the
foundations of resistance against the military junta which is being carried
forward by Aung San Su at present. This explains how inspiring and stimulating
were the KPs not only in the country but on international level also.
The
book, in fact, is mainly relevant with respect to Kashmiri Pandit diaspora. The
writer seems to have no understanding of the contemporary social currents, folk
mindset and the literary currents which make contemporary KP community. The
writer on one hand comments on history and politics and feels that he has got
equal authority to comment on literary trends. This is evident from his comments
on the biggest name in Kashmiri poetry i.e. Sh. Dina Nath Nadim. Nadim has been
equated with Qazi Nazrul Islam and Sukant Bhattacharya of Bengal. This makes it
clear that neither Nadim nor Nazrul and Sukant have been studied. Nadim's
revolution is not as fiery as Nazrul, nor is his romanticism like that of the
Bengali poet. His social consciousness is less like Sukant and more like Tagore
who was a Bengali to his core.
Nadim
was a Kashmiri to his core. He can never be understood without comprehending the
tradition of Kashmiri aesthetics. He has also been equated with Nirala and
Muktibodh of Hindi. A Nadim can better be compared with Nagarjuna. These
comments add nothing to the stature of Nadim. On the contrary, it focuses our
attention on the tragedy that how Kashmiri Pandits, all over India, attend to
their language, the great tradition of the poetry and poetics that Kashmir has
given to the world.
LETTERS
‘Kashmiri
Bitarkita Uttaradhikar'
Sir,
It
is surprising to me to see an elaborate review of my book "Kashmiri
Bitarkita Uttaradhikar" in Sentinel (Feb. 2003).
Please
convey my gratitude to Mr. Dileep Kumar Kaul, who has gone through the book
minutely. The book came in the market in January 2000 and immediately the first
edition was finished. You are free to publish English translation of the book in
your paper, if you are willing to do that.
I
am happy to see that the spirit of the book has been correctly evaluated. From
Mr Kaul's information, I come to know that there is an English book “Kashmir:
A disputed Legacy”. I am trying to collect the book now for my enrichment.
We,
the writers, are teachers and always look forward to see the J&K in its true
perspective. We feel ourselves selfish as our Bengali people raised no hue and
cry for the displaced Kashmiri Pandits. Though the Bengalees have faced the same
fate and have been driven out from East Pakistan and even right now from
Bangladesh.
I
guess that there is a Bengali knowing gentleman with you or Mr Kaul knows
Bengali well. I am willing to get address of them.
Prabhat
Goswami
Retd.
Principal
Distt. Bankura, West Bengal.
KS-Sentinel
of Pandits
Sir,
I
want to congratulate you on bringing out the centenary issue of “Kashmir
Sentinel”. In real terms the issue confirms the name of the journal. It is a
real Sentinel of the Pandit community. It represents our ethos, our plight, our
present problems and also our future aspirations. Kashmir Sentinel has broken
new ground with the centenary issue, and it has become a comprehensive journal.
Its articles and write ups are well researched and documented. The style of
writing is lucid and all its articles are written well. Kashmir Sentinel can
easily hold its own among the best fortnightly magazines of the country. I wish
Kashmir Sentinel to become a habit for us on a permanent basis. The articles
like "Indigenous Rishis v/s Sayyid Sufis", Kashmir's temple of higher
Education', 'Lolab valley's Shrines and Legends', 'Social and Political view of
Sadat Hassan Mantoo' were highly informative and well written. 'Observation of
Holocaust Day", and encroachment of Pandit's land showed how grave
atrocities have taken place and are still happening. I wish we put our petty
differences aside and unite to achieve our goal which is no less than our 'Panun
Kashmir."
Pradeep Kaul Khodballi
Sarshar:
Pioneer of Urdu-Hindi Novel
By Ravi M.Bakaya
Firoz
Mookerjee,
who lives in London, was born in undivided India. She graduated from Lucknow
University and later got her Ph.D. from the University of London, where she
worked on Ratan Nath Dar ‘Sarshar’ under the supervision of Ralph Russell,
Emeritus Reader in Urdu. This book is a revised version of her thesis. All
lovers of Urdu-Hindi literature in particular and Indian literature in general
will welcome the publication of the first book on Sarshar in English. However,
the importance of this book goes far beyond that. It is the first authoritative
research work on the complete works of Sarshar.
The
second half of the nineteenth century was a very important period in the history
of Urdu, Hindi and Bengali prose. The ‘father of modern Hindi’, Bharatendu
Harish Chandra (1850-1885), the great Bengali novelist, Bankim Chandra Chatterji
(1838-1894), and Ratan NathSarshar (app. 1842-1902)- lived and worked
during this period. Though Rabindranath Tagore (1861-1941). also started writing
in this period, his better known works belong to the twentieth century.
Bankim,
Bharatendu and Sarshar were each distinct in his own way. What they had in
common was their pioneering work in their own literature, their familiarity with
English literature, which to some extent influenced their work, and the
‘didactic’ character of their literary work.
Ratan
Nath Dar (‘Sarshar’ was his pen-name or takhallus) was born in 1842 in a
Kashmiri Pandit family domiciled in Lucknow. His father, Baij Nath Dar, was a
respected and influential citizen of Lucknow, but he died when Ratan Nath was
barely four years old. The Dars lived in the neighbourhood of cultured Muslim
families, and the young fatherless child learned his Urdu from the expressive
and gracious speech spoken by Muslim ladies of his mohalla.
The
Brahmins who had emigrated from Kashmir Valley in the eighteenth century ‘to
seek fame and fortune in the rich plains below’ in Jawahar Lal Nehru’s
words, had settled down mainly in Delhi and the United Provinces and had adopted
Urdu as their language, producing a number of distinguished Urdu writers,
scholars and poets, of whom Sarshar was undoubtedly one of the greatest.
Unfortunately, not much is known about his personal life and even the year of
his birth and the date of his death are matters of conjecture and dispute.
(Contrast this with his Hindu contemporary, Bharatendu Harish Chandra. An
obituary published after his death mourns that ‘his age was only 34 years, 3
months, 27 days, 17 hours, 7 minutes and 48 seconds’!)
Sarshar,
after leaving school, went to Canning College, which had been established by the
British in 1864, but he left without taking a degree. However, he came out of
college with a knowledge of English
literature which stood him in good stead during his career as a writer. He
started his working life in Kheri near Lucknow as a teacher. It was in this
period that he started writing articles for various Urdu newspapers and
magazines, the most notable of these being Avadh Punch. Some of his articles
were on social themes. His articles in an Urdu periodical,
Akhbar-I-Sarishta-i-Talim, published by the Department of Public Instruction,
drew the attention of the Director of the Department, who noted in his annual
report that Sarshar’s translations from English were the best he had seen.
In
1878 Sarshar was invited by Munshi
Naval Kishore, the biggest publisher of those days, to edit Avadh Akhbar, which
became a rival and competitor of Avadh Punch. Sarshar edited this paper with
distinction from 1878 to 1893 and many of his writings were first printed in it.
These included his voluminous novel, Fasana Azad, which was serialised by the
paper. Naval Kishore published it later in four volumes, the first being brought
out in 1880. Fasana Azad made Sarshar famous; while it was being serialised in
Avadh Akhbar, it was read and enjoyed by all sections of society. This is a huge
work, comprising four volumes totalling about 3000 pages. It relates the
adventures of its central hero, Azad, and his inseparable companion, ‘Khoji’
(a humorous diminutive for Khwaja) who provides cause for endless mirth with his
antics. Sarshar was undoubtedly influenced by Don Quioxote in writing this
story. Above all, it was Sarshar’s mastery of ‘the vivid, racy colloquial’
language of Lucknow that made his work so popular.
This
command of language is nowhere more evident than in the passages of dialogue
which form so large a part of the whole work. Sarshar knew how well he could
write dialogue, and he uses this talent to the full...He knew exactly the forms
of speech, the special vocabulary and the characteristic style and tone
appropriate to each of the wide range of characters of different classes and
different areas whom he introduces in his pages. The number of characters who
appear in Fasana Azad is enormous, yet all seem quite distinctive...
Some
idea of the scope and volume of Sarshar’s literary output can be gained from
the following lines in Firoze Mookerjee’s book:
During
his editorship of Avadh Akhbar Sarshar wrote many articles on political, social
and literary subjects. In 1887 he published a translation of Donald Mackenzie
Wallace’s History of Russia, a re-written version of an earlier novel, now
entitled ‘Jam-i-Sarshar’. Two years later he translated Lord Dufferin’s
Letters from High Latitudes. In 1890 his novel, Sair-i-Kuhsar, appeared,
followed some time before 1893 by Kamini. About 1893 (Saksena) he started a
series of short novels under the general title of Khim-Kada-i-Sarashar. Included
in this series were Kururn Dhum, Bichhri Dulhan, Tufan-I-Betamizi, Pi Kahan,
Hushsho and Rangile Siyar. Sometime during this period he translated a political
pamphlet written by Dr Hunter, a history of Egypt entitled Shakh-i-Nabat and a
slightly abridged version of the Arabian Nights. In 1894 came Khudai Faujdar, an
adaption and free translation of Don Quixote.
HOWEVER,
in all his work, Sarshar aimed at reforming Indian society, cleansing it of
obscurantist ideas. This didactic approach was usual in the literature of those
times and, indeed, it characterizes all classical literature to some extent. As
he said, introducing Fasana Azad when he began serialising it in Avadh Akhbar :
Our
real aim in this series is to enable the readers of Avadh Akbhar in the guise of
humour to become fully conversant with education and culture and good taste,
with correct conversational usage and the idioms appropriate to various
occasions, with the atmosphere of every kind of gathering and with the manners
of society as a whole..so that (knowledge of) the various states of human
communities and the effect of the company one keeps and the climate of the age
may bring substantial benefit to our country, so that men’s minds may be
illumined by the radiance of good thoughts and excellent morals, and their
mentality cleansed of the darkness of corrupting ideas and the unworthy traits
of the ill-bred, and upright minds may receive the frill benefits that accrue
from a sane training...Our aim is that from reading these articles they may at
one and the same time derive pleasure and enjoyment and amusement on the one
hand, and linguistic accomplishment and lofty ideas, on the other.
Towards
the end of his life, Sarshar went to live in Hyderabad, which was in those days
a great centre of Urdu language and literature. According to his own account,
published in Kashmir Prakash of March 1899:
About
four years ago I went to Madras as a member of the Congress (the Madras session
of the Indian National Congress was held in 1894) and from there my good fortune
brought me to Hyderahad, Deccan. Prominent Hindus and Muslims welcomed me
enthusiastically as did the public at large. Maharaja Kishan Parshad, the
Nizam’s Minister for the Army and a former Prime Minister, appointed me at a
salary of Rs 200 a month to correct his poems and prose.
Sarshar
spent the last few years of his life in Hyderabad as the literary mentor of
Maharaja Kishan Parshad. He brought out a literary journal called
Dabdaba-i-Asafia at the same time. A novel, Chanchal Nar, began to be serialised
in this magazine, but was never finished. The Nizam also patronised Sarshar.
Apart
from being a foremost prose writer of his days, Sarshar was also a distinguished
poet. His poetic theme is love, but he has written on other subject as well. His
best known poem is his masnavi
‘Tohfa-I-Sarshar’ which he wrote to quell the outcry of orthodox Kashmiri
Brahmins against the visit to England of his friend Bishan Naryan Dar, a
barrister. In this long poem Sarshar makes fun of the Pandits who wanted to
boycott Bishan Narayan Dar because he had dared to cross the seven-seas.
Sarshar
died at the age of 55 or 56-his end being hastened by his addiction to drink. He
had himself confessed:
Peene
pe jab ate hain phir bas nahin karte,
Maikhana
me sunte nahin Sarshar kiseeki.
(Once
he strats drinking, he won’t stop. In the drinking house Sarshar doesn’t
listen to anyone).
Firoze
Mookerjee appropriately devotes considerable space in her book to Lucknow of
Sarshar’s days, which had inspired most of his work. There is an informative
chapter on the prose narrative tradition inherited by Sarshar, which he
developed further, giving it a modern trend. All of his main works have been
discussed by the author of the book, as also his minor novels and his role as a
translator. In conclusion, Feroze Mookerjee says:
When
we review the course of Sarshar’s development as a writer, we see at once that
the key period extends from 1878 to
1890. In the course of these twelve years as he progresses from the stage of
Fasana Azad, a stage in which,
though closely tied to the old tradition, he is grafting on to it the new modes
of writing which characterise the moden novel, to the stage where in Jam-I-Sarshar
and Sair-I-Kohsar, he has all but severed his ties with the old and practically
completed a transition to the new. After that the trend is reversed, and already
in Kamini, he is in many respects back behind the starting point which Fasana
Azad represented. Yet, taken as a whole, his writing represents a great step
forward in the development of Urdu prose and fiction.
Firoze
Mookerjee draws pointed attention to Sarshar’s striking attitude to women:
Above all, he is a champion of women’s rights. More than any other Urdu